Working Group 4 "Galaxy Evolution" The WG4 has identified two level 1 science goals in the Bologna SKA meeting. These are HI surveys to trace the evolution of gas content in galaxies from the present to z~5 and deep continuum survyes which trace the star formation in galaxies in an unbiased way out to similar redshifts as faint starforming galaxies at intermediate redshift dominate the counts at faint levels The requirements for these are summarized in a spreadsheet, along with the specs taken from the white paper design documents. Highlighted in red are the items which are discrepant. Most designs meet the specs for the HI sureys as they have a large fraction of the collecting area in a condensed configuration for the required Tb sensitivity. Main problem is the small FOV of the KARST design which is not supplemented with a focal plane array to get multiple beams on the sky to get a larger FOV. The continuum surveys require sufficient resolution to avoid being severely limited by confusion. Here 0.1" is not quite enough at 1.4 GHz and really 0.01" is required at the nanoJy level. Pushing to higher frequencies will help in terms of resolution and confusion, but for the population of star forming objects beyond z = 5 we then are looking at a restfrequency of 30 GHz and heavily discriminate against non-thermal sources with typical spectral indices of -0.8. So surveys in the 1 GHz range appear better suited and if continuum surveys piggyback on the HI surveys then definitely 0.01" at 1.4 ghz is required. Question still to be addressed is the distribution of stations between 100 and 3000 km. The ~0.01" resolution will also help separating nuclear activity from star forming disks at redshifts between 0 and 5. In addition, if hierachical galaxy formation scenarios are correct we expect smaller entities at high redshifts so for the population beyond z = 5 higher resolution is very important for testing these scenarios. For the continuum surveys the main discrepancies with the white paper desings are the limited FOV of the KARST design and perhaps the 1.5 GHz frequency cut off of the European design. Furthermore we need to look closely at the dynamic range. In addition to these level 1 science goals attention was drawn at the Bologna meeting to the possibility of redshifted CO 1-0 emission entering the high frequency part of the band. Two papers of interest in this area are Silk and Spaans (ApJ 488, L97, 1997) and Carilli and Blain (astro-ph/0201004). Silk and Spaans demonstrate that the strength of the CO emission (thanks to the increasing background temparature with redshift) does not change much with redshift, while the emission from dust does. Star forming galaxies with 3x10^5 Orion type regions will produce emission lines with a strenght of about 0.5 - 1 mJy. In other words the muJy regime probes regions with only 300 Orion type regions. Carilli and Blain demonstrate the superior speed of SKA for surveys, thanks to the larger FOV compared to ALMA. ALMA can detect CO lines at high redshift, but is limited here to the higher transitions which only probe the denser regions. The regime beyond z = 10 is most uncertain: no observations yet exist and the predictions are heavily dependent on the adopted cosmology and galaxy formation scenarios. CO 1-0 beyond z = 10 will be observable at frequencies of 10 GHz and below. This area is uniquely accessible to SKA and argues for level 1 science status as it is a direct probe of galaxy formation scenarios. Pushing the high frequency limit to 20 GHz will expand the horizon to CO 2-1 beyond z = 10 and allow CO 1-0 to be observed beyond z = 4.7. Interestingly this is about the redshift where the HI surveys will only detect the most massive galaxies, so the CO regime becomes highly complemenatry to the redshift range probed by the HI surveys! This argues for 20 GHz as upper cut-off for the SKA designs. Main point is the superior speed for surveys as demonstrated by Carilli and Blain. Only 4 designs meet the 10 GHz criterion, whereas two (the Canadian and the US design) go as high as 20 GHz. The table below illustrates the redshift space covered by ALMA and SKA: CO transition ALMA SKA (10 GHZ) SKA (20 GHz) SKA (30 GHZ) 1-0 z < 2.8 z > 10.5 z > 4.7 z > 2.8 2-1 < 6.7 > 22 > 10.5 > 6.7 3-2 < 10.5 > 33.5 > 16.5 > 10.5 4-3 < 14.3 > 45 > 22 > 14.3