"Sidelobes? Pssh... let's just CLEAN 'em!"

<<Previous Up

"Sidelobes? Pssh... let's just CLEAN 'em!"

Logged on 04/02/13 01:17:25

Yeah, good luck with that.

The CLEAN algorithm relies on the PSF being identical to the analytic PSF for every point in the image. For the central source with its partially inflated sidelobes it won't be successful, and will leave residual PSF-like emission around it.

You can see the result below for both the unperturbed sky and the double flare sky. Note again the sigma values in the Purr FITS renders. Awesome as Purr is it often doesn't do the most photogenic job of making PNG out of a FITS file, so I've attached two images (on the same colour scale!) below, exported directly from Tigger.

This residual PSF emission around sources is usually a good sign that something is amiss (unless of course you are interested in astrophysical transients -- you don't want to calibrate out your Nature paper).

Can you think of a calibration approach that would take care of this problem?

Note that the CASA imager / lwimager will only perform a clean operation on the CORRECTED column of a Measurement Set, so I had to play a quick game of "Musical Columns" to get the images below.

Data products

KAT7_1445_1x16_12h.ms.CORRECTED_DATA.channel.1ch.restored.fits (header)

0-full.png0-hist-full.png
0-hist-zoom.png
data range:-0.091622,1.68326
size:1024x1024x1x1
mean:0.00159328
sigma:0.0301834
clipping:95%
clip range:-0.0378901,0.0349079

KAT7_1445_1x16_12h.ms.DATA.channel.1ch.restored.fits (header)

0-full.png0-hist-full.png
0-hist-zoom.png
data range:-0.0308128,1.09137
size:1024x1024x1x1
mean:0.00102314
sigma:0.018703
clipping:95%
clip range:-0.00999096,0.00973495
transient_sim_data_image.png

transient_sim_data_image.png

transient_sim_corrected_image.png

transient_sim_corrected_image.png